Repo path
reporting/founder-gtm/artifacts/private-beta/sales/sales-proof-claims-sheet.md
Founder-facing, maturity-aware claim set built around speed, human control, whole-lifecycle delivery, and insight travel.
Repo path
reporting/founder-gtm/artifacts/private-beta/sales/sales-proof-claims-sheet.md
Notes
No additional notes recorded.
Mapped workstreams
Mapped appendices
Raw source preview
Raw, unprocessed file text shown below.
# Sales-ready proof claims This is a founder-review draft for demos, decks, follow-up material, and live private-beta conversations. It uses the current launch narrative: answer faster, stay in control, and make insight travel further. ## How to use this sheet - Choose three default claims for founder-led conversations. - Pair every claim with a workflow, screen, approved customer example, or measured operating signal. - Label the supporting product as live, beta, selected-customer-only, or directional. - Treat mechanism proof as mechanism proof; do not turn it into an unmeasured customer outcome. ## Recommended core claims ### Answer faster without taking the researcher out of the loop - Say: `<un>peel helps insight teams move from a research question to a usable answer faster, while keeping the researcher in control of the decisions that matter.` - Proof hook: live survey and research workflows, structured review, and the human-in-the-loop Trust Centre. - Maturity note: show only the workflows that are live for the buyer's agreed beta scope. ### Run the research, not just store the outputs - Say: `Unlike a repository that only receives finished work, <un>peel connects design, fieldwork, quality review, analysis, and evidence reuse across the research lifecycle.` - Proof hook: the design-collect-connect-share workflow, live core research products, and the connected evidence model. - Maturity note: this is the platform differentiation; it is not a claim that every planned product is already generally available. ### Keep quality visible while the work is still live - Say: `Teams can see and review quality signals while fieldwork is running instead of waiting for a hidden cleanup step at the end.` - Proof hook: the live Trust Centre, its Real / Unique / Engaged review structure, human review, and the approved `38+ quality metrics` claim. - Maturity note: do not claim Qualtrics-class post-field response-quality or enterprise maturity. ### Make insight travel beyond the final debrief - Say: `Research stays connected to its evidence so people can find, reuse, and build on what the organisation has already learned.` - Proof hook: Insight Navigator in controlled beta and the connected evidence layer. - Maturity note: describe Insight Navigator as controlled beta and Segment Lens as in build; do not imply broad, measured cross-study ROI yet. ### Keep AI work traceable and reviewable - Say: `AI does useful work inside a governed research workflow, with the source material and human decisions kept visible.` - Proof hook: evidence-linked retrieval, project history, and reviewable decisions. - Maturity note: show the exact traceability that exists in the demonstrated workflow; do not generalise beyond it. ## Product claims that need maturity labels - Surveys, Discussion Groups, Guided Interviews, and Trust Centre: sell the live core that can actually be demonstrated and delivered. - Discussion Groups V2: in test; do not present the V2 improvement set as fully released. - Insight Navigator: controlled beta. - Segment Lens: in build, with the current August-September target. - Research Guard and Research Architect: October beta targets; preview only where explicitly agreed. ## Guardrails for live use - Do not lead with `confidence` as the category differentiator. Use confidence, defensibility, audit trail, or governance only when they answer the buyer's question. - Do not offer the `full designed product set` as though it is all live. - Do not present Research Guard or Research Architect as generally available. - Do not claim enterprise security, procurement, legal, connector, or low-touch rollout maturity beyond the current pack. - Do not use customer names, logos, quotes, or outcomes until the proof-permission register records approval. - Use `38+ quality metrics` where helpful. Do not use competing `20,000+` or `30,000+ lines` claims until the source and approved wording are reconciled. ## Founder approval required - Select the three claims that become the default founder talk track. - Approve the exact screen, mechanism, or evidence attached to each claim. - Approve which claims can be public and which stay inside private-beta conversations. - Confirm which named customers, logos, quotes, and results may be used.