Carry forward enterprise client-side as the primary beta audience
This is already well supported by repo evidence and does not need reopening for beta execution.
Checklist
Use this page when you want the detailed tactical list underneath the founder briefing. Items are grouped by pillar first, then labeled by phase and launch criticality so nothing important hides in long-form prose.
GTM pillar
We know who private beta is for first: in-house research teams at larger companies. Agencies are still relevant, but they are not the main focus right now.
This is already well supported by repo evidence and does not need reopening for beta execution.
The secondary-audience rule is now written down so agency language can stay visible without diluting the main launch story.
The audience choice needs to show up more explicitly in outreach, proof examples, and follow-up material. The actual demo sequence is handled separately in sales-demo-readiness.
GTM pillar
The website story is strong, but the company identity behind it is not fully settled yet.
The site architecture and core copy are already strong enough to support early beta conversations.
Choose the exact parent-brand reference used on the reporting site, website, and first sales assets.
The working beta message stack is now set: a short website headline, plus the fuller positioning line and supporting line for founder-led and sales material.
Create the minimum company-facing scaffolding: legal entity wording, contracting identity, company bio, and procurement-safe footer copy.
The decision register already gives a defensible rule: do not lead with the full suite vision before product truth can support it.
The pre-launch checklist already names the operational fixes needed before broader sharing.
A first proof-claims draft now exists, but it still needs founder validation before it is used in the deck, one-pager, or demo.
A stronger public trust layer depends on legal and company assets that are not yet final.
The product and tool naming system is coherent, but the parent/product name itself is still explicitly provisional.
GTM pillar
The beta offer is clearer now and the first pricing material exists, but pricing rules and entitlement logic still need tightening.
The tier structure is ready; the public versus conversation-led selling stance still needs founder sign-off.
The beta-visible product map is now defined: brand-name beta customers can be given access to the full designed product set, with honest caveats about maturity and a quote expectation.
A founder pricing conversation sheet now exists, so the minimum live-call pricing material is in place even though richer packaging can still follow.
Runtime entitlement checks exist conceptually, but plan definition, usage limits, and metering are still underbuilt.
Billing docs already acknowledge runtime entitlement checks, but plan definition, usage limits, metering, and contract mechanics are still underbuilt.
The website and decision log already give us a defensible platform-first story if we stay explicit about maturity and launch scope.
GTM pillar
We have real product proof and real pilot activity, but not yet a simple repeatable way to show that proof and onboard customers.
The delivery mode is conceptually clear, but the step-by-step beta flow is not yet documented as a reusable operating path.
The product already has unusually specific capability proof that should be treated as a strength, not hidden because case studies are light.
The strategy doc already names directional success signals, but there is no packaged pilot scorecard or time-to-value definition yet.
Musgrave and Leanne material can be converted into short evidence summaries, objection answers, and slide proof points.
Customer walkthroughs and training feedback show that the operating motion can be made concrete quickly once the team defines the default environment and enablement rhythm.
Named quotes, quantified before-and-after proof, and logo permissions remain a later-stage credibility layer rather than a hard beta prerequisite.
GTM pillar
We know the likely sales motion, and the first proof-claims, pricing, and one-pager drafts now exist. What is missing is the polished founder sales kit.
The strategic posture already implies a short list of sensible channels; now those need to be made explicit and ranked.
The site and strategy content already provide the structure; now they need to be converted into a portable founder deck.
A first one-pager draft now exists, but it still needs founder validation and tightening before it becomes the standard follow-up asset.
The website gives us a proof-led base, but there is still no explicit plan for what founder content exists to support outreach.
The objection-handling FAQ now gives the founder and sales team a usable baseline for common questions, even though richer follow-on packaging can still be added later.
Audience and proof work exist; they now need to become a simple outreach and follow-up playbook.
The Musgrave walkthrough and platform story already provide a plausible flow; it now needs to be turned into a repeatable 15-to-20 minute path with a clear opening, screen order, and close.
GTM pillar
The planning and reporting structure now exists, but wider beta selling is still held back by legal setup and trust basics.
This reporting site now provides the first working structure for lean launch sequencing: required now, helpful during beta, and needed for broader GA.
The current privacy and terms pages explicitly announce they are not final, and company identity details are still too light for enterprise comfort.
These are standard asks once conversations move beyond founder curiosity into buyer diligence.
The categories are clear, but the baseline sheet for demos, pilots, activation, and proof progression still needs to be created and populated.
The weekly GTM review cadence is now formalised through a reusable review template, agreed meeting structure, and transcript-to-draft workflow.
The product contains trust signals, but they are not yet packaged into a simple buyer-facing trust story or diligence sheet.